Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Harris v. GlaxoSmithKline
as 3:2023cv20000
Plaintiff:
Luster Ray Harris
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05198
Petitioner:
CHARLES RAY HARRIS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARRIS v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06436
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Harris
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49375
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE RAY HARRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02257
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv29211
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEXTER RAY HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. USA
as 1:2016cv00020
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nance Ray Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brittany Odes, et al v. Christopher Harris, et al
as 13-13720
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRITTANY ODES and MARIA C. SILVA-ODES
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER RAY HARRIS, individually, d.b.a. Christopher Harris, Esq., CHRISTOPHER HARRIS & ASSOCIATES LLC, CHRISTOPHER R. HARRIS P.A. and others
Brittany Odes, et al v. Christopher Harris, et al
as 13-11273
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRITTANY ODES and MARIA C. SILVA-ODES
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER RAY HARRIS, individually, d.b.a. Christopher Harris, Esq., CHRISTOPHER HARRIS & ASSOCIATES LLC, CHRISTOPHER R. HARRIS P.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
