Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Jeb Bush, et al
as 23-14207
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JEB BUSH, KEN MASCARA, LIEUTENANT HASILEY and others
Robert Smith v. Jay Odom, et al
as 23-13670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT V. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY ODOM and OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04785
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ROBERT JAMES SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andre Carstarphen, Sr. v. Kennth Gillespie, et al
as 23-13037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE MAURICE CARSTARPHEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNTH GILLESPIE, MATHEW SIMPSON, ROBERT H. SMITH and others
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18463
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Carstarphen v. Gillespie et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen and Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Sr.
Defendant:
Kennth Gillespie, Mathew Simpson, Robert H. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16435
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TODD SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12178
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07558
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
