Cases 1 - 10 of 13
RADI v. EIDSON et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Defendant:
HOWARD MCCLAIN, PATRICK EIDSON and MATTHEW S RADI
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
RADI v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY COURTHOUSE
as 1:2024cv00141
Respondent:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Petitioner:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
JUDGE DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Damron et al
as 1:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Rady Williams
Defendant:
Wade Damron, Attorney General Chris Carr and Chancellor Teresa MacCartney
Williams v. Chubb
as 1:2021cv02624
Plaintiff:
Rady Williams
Defendant:
Carma Chubb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. City of Atlanta Mayor Office Special Events Ms. Ebony Barley et al
as 1:2018cv05347
Plaintiff:
Rady Williams
Defendant:
Office of Special Events Agent Mr. Andre Stalling, City of Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottom and City of Atlanta Mayor Office Special Events Ms. Ebony Barley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Williams v. Corporation Services 40 Techwood et al
as 1:2018cv05349
Defendant:
Corporation Services 40 Techwood, Koel Kitsch and Security Officers (unknown)
Plaintiff:
Rady Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Georgia State University et al
as 1:2018cv05348
Plaintiff:
Rady Williams
Defendant:
Georgia State University President Mark P. Becker and Georgia State University Chief Joseph Spillane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2018cv02774
Plaintiff:
Rady Williams
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Alvin Dodson and Eboney Barley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prise et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
as 4:2010mi00003
Plaintiff:
Deborah Prise and Heather Rady
Defendant:
Alderwoods Group, Inc.
Movant:
Lawrence Camp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
