Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wilson v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv01757
Petitioner:
Richard L Wilson
Respondent:
Warden Williams and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25076
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73921
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv18233
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 3:2018cv01198
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Wilson
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WILSON v. BASSEY et al
as 4:2015cv00066
Plaintiff:
RICHARD RUFUS WILSON, JR
Defendant:
BASSEY, PAUL MORRIS, DANE COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. LOVE et al.
as 5:2013cv00047
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E WILSON
Defendant:
JESSICA LOVE, P JACKSON, GLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00469
Petitioner:
Richard C. Wilson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Cullman County, Alabama et al
as 5:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Richard L Wilson
Defendant:
Cullman County, Alabama, Cullman County Sheriff's Department and Tyler Roden
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wilson v. Roden et al
as 5:2008cv02284
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Tyler Roden, Mark Maddix, Douglas Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
