Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Mendez v. Brown Davis Interiors, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21396
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Mendez
Defendant:
Brown Davis Interiors, Inc., Todd D Davis and Robert S Brown
Brown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2023cv02135
Petitioner:
Robert Eugene Brown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CARLOS BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01181
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEO BROWN, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2022cv01412
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Jeremy S Pelzer and Erle L Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hughes et al
as 5:2022cv01151
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Brown
Defendant:
Eric L Hughes and Jeremy S Pelzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. LEWIS et al
as 5:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE BROWN
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER COLETTE LEWIS, ADMINISTRATOR MITCHELL NHA, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09309
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE BROWN III and ROBERT WAYNE BROWN, III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08452
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHN BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Robert Brown
as 22-11530
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
