Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Gaguski et al v. Kirby et al
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff: Rudolph Gaguski and Inmates of Fannin Ct. A.D.C.
Defendant: Dane Kirby, Fannin Ct. and Blue Ridge Ga. Court Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02338
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Wordlaw v. Echols et al
as 1:2022cv01951
Plaintiff: Rudolph Wordlaw
Defendant: Michael Echols, John Doe, Family Dollar Stores of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00510
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gaguski v. Garrison et al
as 1:2021cv04377
Plaintiff: Rudolph Shawn Gaguski
Defendant: Sheriff Roger Garrison, Deputy Fulenwider and Deputy Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooley v. Bonner et al
as 2:2021cv00145
Defendant: Tara Bonner, Tara Underwood, Rebecca Becky Ledford and others
Plaintiff: James Rudolph Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04374
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rudolph v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv02726
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Eric Robert Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mohamed v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02120
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff: Rudolph Mohamed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Gosyne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00107
Defendant: GOSBLALYN LLC, Reed Clair, Rudolph Gosyne and others
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?