Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stevens v. Kumar et al
as 8:2023cv02304
Plaintiff:
Mindi Stevens
Defendant:
Dilip Kumar, Cosmic Strands LLC and Ashrant Malhotra
STRAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24529
Plaintiff:
BRANDON STRAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STRANDE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10215
Plaintiff:
LINDA MARIE STRANDE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STRAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22215
Plaintiff:
ELDEN STRAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guske v. Wekiva Springs Center et al
as 3:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
Linda Hasenbalg Guske
Defendant:
Wekiva Springs Center, R. Blanchard, Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Strand v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19329
Plaintiff:
Frances Strand
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STRAND v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
DANNY STRAND
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Mark Strand
as 22-12715
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK D. STRAND
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
