Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Williams v. Cohen et al
as 1:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
John T Williams
Defendant:
Mark H Cohen, Steven D Grimberg, Thomas W Thrash, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Williams v. Sally Yates, et al
as 20-12870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN T. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN PARKER KITCHENS, (AUSA), et al., EDITH RAMERIZ, VALERIE VERDUSE, (FTC), et al. and others
Williams, Scott & Associates LLC et al v. Yates et al
as 1:2019cv04253
Defendant:
Jonathan Nuechterlein, Jennifer D. Odom, Valerie Verduse and others
Plaintiff:
Williams, Scott & Associates LLC and John T. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heard v. Yates et al
as 1:2016mi00021
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Sally Yates, Sam Olens and Nathan Deal
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Smith v. Department of Behavorial Health et al
as 1:2014cv04146
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Department of Behavorial Health, Georgia Regional Hospital, Annette Garvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633
Cartman v. Little et al
as 1:2014cv01557
Plaintiff:
Anthony-Vincent Cartman
Defendant:
Samuel Fenn Little, Strickland, Lawrence Sommerfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-13015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Youhoing et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Shennielle Shellielle Youhoing, Mahabir Nanan, Mohaberry D. Youhoing-Nanan and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff Department, Kemuel Kimbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
