Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Gray v. Weiser Security Services, Inc. (CONSENT)
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Morgan Gray
Defendant:
Weiser Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1875 Jury System Improvement Act (Juror Employment Protection)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Securitas Security Services USA Inc v. Pollard
as 2:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Securitas Security Services USA Inc
Defendant:
Aron Brock Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Shaikh v. County of Mobile/Mobile County Commission(ers) et al
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Ilyas Ahmed Shaikh
Defendant:
County of Mobile/Mobile County Commission(ers), City Of Mobile, Thaddeus Hoyt, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metropolitan Security Services Inc v. VCP City Center, LLC
as 2:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Security Services Inc doing business as Walden Security
Counter Claimant:
VCP City Center, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Metropolitan Security Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
