Cases 1 - 10 of 119
McQueen v. Shelby County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2024cv01124
Defendant:
Chiquita Marbury and Shelby County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooley v. Shelby County Courthouse
as 2:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Tensy Wooley
Defendant:
Shelby County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan et al v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
James Ryan and Patti Ryan
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Beaulieu v. Shelby County, Alabama et al
as 2:2024cv00777
Defendant:
Shelby County, Alabama, Terry Franklin, Shelby County Commission, The and others
Plaintiff:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelby County, Alabama v. Beaulieu
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Shelby County, Alabama
Defendant:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Shelby County Board of Education et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Sherry Wood
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education and Dr. Lewis Brooks
Stinson v. Haddix et al
as 1:2023cv24740
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Wayne Haddix doing business as Ventures Partnership, Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. and Shelby County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
