Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc. v. Siemens Energy, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv01845
Defendant:
John Doe #2, Siemens Energy Inc., John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc.
Interested Party:
General Electric Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Brooks v. Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00428
Plaintiff:
Sandra K. Brooks
Defendant:
Hitachi Automotive Systems Americas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03887
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power v. National Labor Relations Board
as 19-10752
Petitioner:
MITSUBISHI HITACHI POWER SYSTEMS AMERICAS, INC.
Respondent:
NLRB
National Labor Relations Board v. Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Sys.
as 19-10524
Undetermined:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and MITSUBISHI HITACHI POWER SYSTEMS AMERICAS, INC.
Other:
SERVICE
Woods et al v. Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc. et al
as 6:2016cv02038
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woods and Alfa Ramos
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc. and SNI Companies Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Dahill v. Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00928
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dahill
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Harrison et al v. Lufthansa Systems Americas Inc
as 2:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Boyd J Harrison and Elizabeth Stone
Defendant:
Lufthansa Systems Americas Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
