Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Brake v. Landstar Ranger, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
Chase Brake
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger, Inc., TM&F Logistics of NC, LLC, Old Republic Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Australian Therapeutic Supplies PTY LTD v. Naked TM, LLC
as 24-90003
Petitioner:
AUSTRALIAN THERAPEUTIC SUPPLIES PTY LTD
Respondent:
NAKED TM, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Evgeny Ryzhov v. Nikolaevich Durandin, et al
as 23-13661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVGENY RYZHOV
Defendant / Appellee:
NIKOLAEVICH VALERIY DURANDIN, OAO SANATORIUM AUTOMOBILIST, SAFA HAMZIANOVICH ZAKEROV and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
EL v. TM Central Courthouse et al
as 0:2023cv61613
Plaintiff:
Chriszoe EL
Defendant:
TM Central Courthouse, R. Rojas, Phoebee Rebecca Francois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv60688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Patterson v. TM Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Willie Earl Patterson
Defendant:
TM Express, Inc. and Jermaine Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Australian Therapeutic Supplies Pty Ltd v. Naked TM LLC
as 1:2022cv20491
Plaintiff:
Australian Therapeutic Supplies Pty Ltd
Defendant:
Naked TM LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Australian Therapeutic Supplies Pty. Ltd. v. Naked TM LLC
as 1:2022cv20493
Plaintiff:
Australian Therapeutics Supplies Ltd Pty
Defendant:
Naked TM LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
