Cases 1 - 10 of 66,918
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Ebony C Tucker, Funeral Home and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Aragones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Nelson Aragones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
O Crane v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Bryan O Crane
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Transbotics, a division of Scott Systems International, Inc. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Transbotics, a division of Scott Systems International, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KPMG, LLP and INFINITY ROBOTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Medard, James v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21945
Plaintiff:
James Medard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
In re: James Esseks, et al
as 24-11618
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS, CARL CHARLES, LATISHA FAULKS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
USA v. Taneika Dewdney
as 24-11621
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TANEIKA LASHAWN DEWDNEY
USA v. Ivan Echavarria
as 24-11600
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
IVAN EMILIO ECHAVARRIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
