Cases 1 - 10 of 4,273
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hill v. Tannex Development LC
as 4:2024cv10056
Plaintiff:
Allison Hill
Defendant:
Tannex Development LC doing business as Opal Key Resort & Marina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Pugh v. Fleming et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lenard Pugh
Defendant:
Officer Robert R. Fleming, Sheriff Victor Hill, Judge Wanda Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafayette v. Owens et al
as 8:2024cv01383
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Lafayette, II
Defendant:
Chelsea Owens, Joyce Owens, Keron Enslow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffery-Allen Hill-Yisra'EL v. Attorney General, State of Texas, et al
as 24-11824
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY-ALLEN HILL-YISRA'EL
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF TEXAS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jeffery-Allen Hill-Yisra'EL v. Attorney General, State of Texas, et al
as 24-11823
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY-ALLEN HILL-YISRA'EL
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF TEXAS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
HILL v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
TROY M HILL
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEIL, Natasha Barkley, Mike Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HILL v. NEWBERN et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY T HILL
Defendant:
E NEWBERN, KIGHT, VAN HOUTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
