Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Nadya Diaz v. Adam Hames, et al
as 23-11209
Petitioner / Appellant:
NADYA IVETTE DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ADAM MARSHALL HAMES, MATTHEW KYLE WINCHESTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA and others
Diaz v. Hames et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Petitioner:
Nadya Ivette Diaz
Respondent:
Adam Hames, Matthew Kyle Winchester, United States District Court ND GA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00811
Petitioner:
Walter L. Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Mark Inch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv39155
Plaintiff:
WALTER J JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv82027
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WALTER KEVIN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01460
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Walter L. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Drake v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al
as 1:2018cv04296
Defendant:
Walter E. Johnson, East Texas Bridge, Inc., Travelers Commercial Insurance Co. and others
Plaintiff:
E.V. Drake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Ivey et al
as 6:2018cv01314
Plaintiff:
Walter W. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Johnson v. State of Florida
as 6:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
Walter Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
