Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gobert v. Perry
as 4:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Michael James Gobert
Respondent:
Warden James Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danenberg v. Perry
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Danenberg
Defendant:
Warden James Kevin Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Gordon et al
as 1:2023cv04357
Plaintiff:
Lee Anderson Wright
Defendant:
Officer Gordon, Unit MGR Edwards, Warden James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BISHOP v. PANE et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALAN BISHOP
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES PANE, TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Pane et al
as 1:2022cv03003
Plaintiff:
Joshua Alan Bishop
Defendant:
Warden James Pane, Commissioner Timothy C. Ward, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SPANN
as 3:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
LOUIS DAVID JONES
Respondent:
Warden JAMES C SPANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaither v. Bryson et al
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Carol W. Bragg, Warden Mr. Philbin, Gwen Robertson and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2020cv00349
Plaintiff:
SHERWIN S PERKINS
Defendant:
FAIRVIEW PARK HOSPITAL, KENNETH COWENS, BILLY MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2020cv00351
Plaintiff:
SHERWIN S PERKINS
Defendant:
FAIRVIEW PARK HOSPITAL, KENNETH COWENS, BILLY MCKENZIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Ashley-Toby et al
as 6:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Sgt. Susan Clayton, Warden Berry, Javaka Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Deryan M. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
