Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Wheat, Brandon Loyd v. Snyder
as 2:2024cv14082
Plaintiff:
Brandon Loyd Wheat
Defendant:
Sheriff William L Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentel Pickens
Defendant:
Ms. Morgan, Mr. Smith, Mr. Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheat v. Bradshaw
as 9:2023cv81593
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wheat
Defendant:
Sheriff Ric Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. Bauer Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2023cv04260
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Jared R. Wheat
Defendant:
Bauer Holdings Limited and Wolfson Brands Ltd. doing business as Crazybulk
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 a False representation-goods sold-interstate commer
WHEAT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14272
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA WHEAT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHEAT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12477
Plaintiff:
TYLER WHEAT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. Aramark et al
as 1:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Robert Lamont Lee
Defendant:
Aramark, Naphcare, Rockdale County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINARD v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09991
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KINARD, LAYWOOD MOLETTE, JONATHAN OVERFELT and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Dr. Osula et al
as 2:2022cv01567
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Dr. Osula and Lt. Wheat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van Daniel v. Mickey Inc et al
as 5:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
Roderick Van Daniel
Defendant:
Mickey Inc, Mickey Summerford, Jonathan Edward McNatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
