Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Sur Green, III, et al v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-7139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sur Harry Green, III and Cynthia Sur Green, III
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Georgia, "we" the people INC or LLC, Dooly County Sheriff, independent INC or LLC, John Shedd, Lt. "associates" INC or INC and others
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al
as 20-7062
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party:
State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth W. Kennedy
American Lung Association, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1140
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator
Petitioner:
American Lung Association and American Public Health Association
Intervenor:
State of Kansas, Phil Bryant, Governor of the State of Mississippi, State of Texas and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
State of New York, et al v. DOL, et al
as 19-5125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
District of Columbia, State of Maryland, State of Washington and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, United States Department of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
Lake Cities Chamber of Commerce, (Texas), State of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matt Bevin, Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, (Nevada) and others
Laurence Schneider, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National, et al
as 19-7025
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, United States of America, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, State of California, ex rel. Laurence Schneider and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Chase Home Finance, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Laurence Schneider
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
USA, et al v. Anthem, Inc., et al
as 17-5028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of California, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthem, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Cigna Corporation
Special Master:
Richard A. Levie
USA, et al v. Anthem, Inc., et al
as 17-5024
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of California, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthem, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Cigna Corporation
Special Master:
Richard A. Levie
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1022
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, Acting Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
USA ex. re. Laurence Schneider, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-7003
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider, State of California, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider, State of Delaware, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Laurence Robert Schneider
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Chase Home Finance, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
