Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California matching "dolby laboratories"
Cases 21 - 30 of 37
United Parcel Service, Inc. et al v. Doremi Labs,Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv07840
Plaintiff: United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service France S.N.C.
Defendant: Doremi Labs,Inc., Doremi Technologies, LLC, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv02488
Plaintiff: Monster Cable Products Inc
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02975
Plaintiff: Monster Cable Products, Inc.
Defendant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv01846
Not Yet Classified: Third Party Sony Mobile Communications USA, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, Non-Party Rovi Corp. and others
Petitioner: InterDigital Technology Corporation, S3G Graphics Co. LTD., InterDigital Communications LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: Cellco Partnership and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Interested Party: Siemens AG and Microsoft Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant: HTC Corporation
Intervenor: Research In Motion Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation v. Shenzhen Newland Electronic Industry Co., Ltd et al
as 2:2009cv00059
Plaintiff: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation, Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation, Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation and others
Defendant: Shenzhen Newland Electronic Industry Co., Ltd and Albert Hu
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
THERASENSE V BECTON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1511
Amicus Curiae: 1st Media, LLC, Acacia Research Corporation, Alejandro Martinez and others
Plaintiff-Appellant: Abbott Laboratories and TheraSense, Inc. (n/k/a Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.)
Defendant-Appellee: Bayer HealthCare LLC, Becton, Dickinson and Company and Nova Biomedical Corporation
LUCENT TECH V GATEWAY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1485
Amicus Curiae: 3M Company, Apple Inc., Bank of America Corporation and others
Defendant/Counterclaimant: Dell, Inc.
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant: Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant: Multimedia Patent Trust
Oracle Corporation:
TAFAS V KAPPOS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1352
Amicus Curiae: AARP, AmberWave Systems Corporation, American Intellectual Property Law Association and others
Defendant-Appellant: David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Prop and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff-Appellee: Glaxo Group Limited (d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham Corporation (dba GlaxoSmithKline), SmithKline Beecham PLC and others
InterDigital Communications, LLC:
Harthcock v. MIPS Technologies Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00515
Plaintiff: Jerry David Harthcock
Defendant: MIPS Technologies Inc, Adimos Inc, Advanced Micro Devices Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DOLBY LABS V LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES
as 06-1595
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant: Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?