Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Valerie Flores v. City of Madison Wisconsin, et al
as 24-7076
Plaintiff:
Valerie Flores
Defendant:
City of Madison Wisconsin, Mayor, Wisconsin Board of Regents, Duane County, Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walter Allen v. Dept. of City Wide Admin. Svcs.
as 24-7051
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Allen
Defendant:
Dept. of City Wide Admin. Svcs., (DCAS)
ALLEN v. DEPT. OF CITY WIDE ADMIN. SVCS.
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
WALTER ALLEN
Defendant:
DEPT. OF CITY WIDE ADMIN. SVCS.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ALLEN v. COOPER et al
as 1:2023cv03616
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, N.C. STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JENNIFER ELWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SOLOMON BROWN v. FEDERAL CITY RECOVERY SERVICES
as 1:2023cv03297
Plaintiff:
CARGYLE SOLOMON BROWN
Defendant:
FEDERAL CITY RECOVERY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORES v. CITY OF MADISON et al
as 1:2023cv03276
Plaintiff:
VALERIE FLORES
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISON, CITY OF MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAMUEL KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SPENCER v. CITY OF ROCKFORD DISTRICT ATTORNEY
as 1:2023cv03236
Plaintiff:
PRINCESS MARIA SPENCER
Defendant:
CITY OF ROCKFORD DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ISHAK v. GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
AKUA ISHAK
Defendant:
GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEE CARMONA, CEDRIC BURRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
