Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Matthew Jones v. Central District Station
as 24-7083
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Central District Station
Valerie Flores v. City of Madison Wisconsin, et al
as 24-7076
Plaintiff:
Valerie Flores
Defendant:
City of Madison Wisconsin, Mayor, Wisconsin Board of Regents, Duane County, Wisconsin and others
JONES v. CENTRAL DISTRICT STATION
as 1:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
CENTRAL DISTRICT STATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHERVEN v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2023cv03534
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHERVEN v. DICK DIDDLER AND THE ASSHOLE TICKLERS
as 1:2023cv02970
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
DICK DIDDLER AND THE ASSHOLE TICKLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jiemin Bai v. Matthew Graves, et al
as 23-5191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jiemin Bai
Defendant / Appellee:
Matthew M. Graves, U.S. Attorney and Jessie Kong Liu, Formerly U.S. Attorney for DC, In her both official and personal capacity
CAI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
XIULING CAI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILL v. VIOREL et al
as 1:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
STEVEN VIOREL, AUSTIN GILL, BLOCK BY BLOCK INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Green, et al v. DOJ, et al
as 23-5159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew D. Green, Andrew Bunnie Huang and Alphamax, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Library of Congress, U.S. Copyright Office and others
SHERVEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
