General Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 87
CROSBY v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv01428
Petitioner: JAMES B.V. CROSBY
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STRADER v. STATE OF KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv03626
Petitioner: JAMES STRADER
Respondent: STATE OF KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICK FREEMAN, JEFF ZUMDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ENLOP v. HAKE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01831
Plaintiff: JOSHUA JAMES ENLOP
Defendant: JEFF HAKE, CHRIS CLASS, SIMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LAUGHREY v. WORMUTH et al
as 1:2021cv03311
Petitioner: JAMES A LAUGHREY and JAMES A. LAUGHREY
Respondent: CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH, CHRISTOPHER GLOVER and CHRISTINE WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURNS v. POLK et al
as 1:2021cv00636
Respondent: MICHAEL N. BATES, RALSTON D. MARSHALL and BALDEN B. POLK
Petitioner: JAMES EDWARD BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BROWN v. STROEBEL
as 1:2021cv00104
Respondent: GREGORY JAMES STROEBEL
Petitioner: DAVID BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
COLLIER v. BURNES et al
as 1:2020cv02701
Defendant: DANIEL T. FLOYD, BALDEN D. POLK, DANNY OLIPHANT and others
Plaintiff: DARRON LASHAWN COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BLACKMON v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2020cv02446
Respondent: WILLIAMS
Petitioner: JAMES BLACKMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PARKS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2020cv01481
Defendant: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff: DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BARLOW v. SUNIA, et al
as 1:2019cv03442
Petitioner: JAMES GLENN BARLOW
Respondent: SOLIALI'I FALEPO, TAUESE VA'AOMALA SUNIA and DAVID L. BERNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?