Cases 1 - 10 of 33
COHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COHEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDDIE ANDERSON, EMERY MCCOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOLAN v. BAKER et al
as 1:2021cv01348
Defendant:
ANDREW ESPOSITO, SUSAN MARINELLI, MARSHA BAKER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DOLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.O. et al v. SESSIONS, III et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, JOHN DOE CBP AGENTS, JOHN DOE ORR PERSONNEL and others
Plaintiff:
C.J., F.C., L.J. and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FALICE v. O'BRIEN
as 1:2018cv02946
Defendant:
JOHN O'BRIEN
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. FALICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv02163
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, M. ROBINOWITZ, J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCIOLI v. CITY OF NEW BERN et al
as 1:2016cv00877
Plaintiff:
DANA SCIOLI
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BERN, COUNTY OF LOUDOUN, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv02093
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LINDA HAMILTON, STEVEN KIRSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
LEONARD C. ANDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. BITTINGER et al
as 1:2015cv00545
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
BITTINGER, MARCHANELLO, T. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANSER v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00867
Plaintiff:
DAVID K. DANSER
Defendant:
GEORGE E. SAMUELS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RODNEY W. CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
