Cases 21 - 30 of 86
ADAMS v. HEAD et al
as 1:2021cv02670
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRIS HEAD, JOHN EOFF, MARY JEAN CREAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv02265
Defendant:
ALI ALEXANDER, DONALD J. TRUMP, DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CONRAD SMITH, DANNY MCELROY, BYRON EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
PATEL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv02263
Defendant:
INDIA, UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv02101
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DONALD J. TRUMP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMAR v. TRUMP
as 1:2021cv01034
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
ANDREI SUMAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00752
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DAN CALDWELL, CHRIS BRUYN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SARHAN and BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv00710
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
STANLEY LORENZO WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWALWELL v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00586
Plaintiff:
ERIC SWALWELL
Defendant:
RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, MO BROOKS, DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
DURU v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00486
Defendant:
MARK S. ZEMELMAN, H.R. OF SAINT JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA, KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION COLORADO and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
THOMPSON v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00400
Defendant:
OATH KEEPERS, PROUD BOYS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C., DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Plaintiff:
BENNIE G. THOMPSON, MARCIA KAPTUR, HENRY C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
