Cases 31 - 40 of 1,016
NASH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORP. INC et al
as 1:2023cv03134
Plaintiff:
LINDA A. NASH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORP. INC, STATE OF FLORIDA CORPORATION, SEMINOLE COUNTY FLORIDA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOVETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02879
Plaintiff:
AARON LOVETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RINK v. MCCABE
as 1:2023cv02880
Plaintiff:
BERNICE RINK
Defendant:
JOHN MCCABE and MCCABE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE A et al v. SPAHN
as 1:2023cv02859
Plaintiff:
John Doe A, John Doe B and John Doe C
Defendant:
CAROL SPAHN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
PATEL v. LIU et al
as 1:2023cv02699
Plaintiff:
KASHYAP PATEL and ROD ROSENSTEIN
Defendant:
JESSIE K. LIU, ROBERT HUR, ED O'CALLAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TRUONG v. SALIERNO et al
as 1:2023cv02592
Plaintiff:
MAC TRUONG, Dr. Mac Truong and DMT MAC TRUONG
Defendant:
JOHN V. SALIERNO, NICHOLAS P. CORRADO, SAVIO D. FIGARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELLS v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv02533
Plaintiff:
LEROY LAMONT WELLS
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, DSG, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERRY v. YELLIN et al
as 1:2023cv02519
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. BERRY
Defendant:
ROBERT RUBIN, CITIBANK, ALAN GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
