Cases 1 - 10 of 40
COOKE v. BUREAU OF CONSULAR AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2023cv03035
Plaintiff:
TAJMERE COOKE
Defendant:
BUREAU OF CONSULAR AFFAIRS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. COOKSON et al
as 1:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
DARRIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALVIN COOKSON, DANNY MASON, ALICE COOKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Manetirony Clervrain, et al v. Patrick Mara, et al
as 22-7035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Manetirony Clervrain
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant / Appellee:
Patrick Mara, Renee Mcdonald Hutchins, Tim Cook and others
CLERVRAIN v. MARA et al
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN and FRANCIS COBBINA OSEI-FOSU
Defendant:
PATRICK MARA, RENEE MCDONALD HUTCHINS, TIM COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CELLI v. WEINGARTEN et al
as 1:2021cv03359
Plaintiff:
LUCIO CELLI
Defendant:
RANDI WEINGARTEN, COGAN, BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
MONTES v. CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
as 1:2021cv02576
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO MONTES, JR.
Defendant:
CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LA RIVA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
as 1:2020cv01937
Plaintiff:
CLAIRE COOK, NICOLE ROUSSELL, GLORIA LA RIVA and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01879
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
INGRAM-BEY v. BURCH et al
as 1:2019cv01629
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, STATE OF ILLINOIS INC. 1818, MANUEL MANDUJANO and others
Plaintiff:
TERRELL INGRAM-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
