Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cedric Greene v. St. Vincent De Paul
as 24-7024
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
St. Vincent De Paul, Cardinal Manning Center
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan, et al
as 22-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daryl Sharp, Ambassador and Representative of the Living God Jehovah
Defendant / Appellee:
Timothy J. Dolan, Archbishop of New York, Christophe Pierre, Apostolic Nuncio Vatican Embassy, Jose Horacio Gomez Velasco, Archbishop of Los Angeles, President of the USCCB and others
GLASS v. CARDINAL LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
as 1:2021cv00921
Defendant:
CARDINAL LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GLASS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Blumenthal, et al v. Donald Trump
as 19-5237
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Amy Klobuchar, Jeff Merkley, Cory A. Booker and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
Leonard I. Garth, Judge, Scholar, Rutgers Law School, Frank Greenberg, Tom Harkin, (D-IA) and others
BLUMENTHAL et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, BRIAN SCHATZ and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
HAROLD H. BRUFF, PETER SMITH, BOB CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Archdiocese of Washington v. WMATA, et al
as 17-7171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Archdiocese of Washington, Donald Cardinal Wuerl, a Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington, a corporation sole
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Paul J. Wiedefeld, in his official capacity as General Manager of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Ethics and Public Policy Center, First Liberty Institute, Becket Fund for Religious Liberty and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
