Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Richard Blumenthal, et al v. Donald Trump
as 19-5237
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Amy Klobuchar, Jeff Merkley, Cory A. Booker and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
Leonard I. Garth, Judge, Scholar, Rutgers Law School, Frank Greenberg, Tom Harkin, (D-IA) and others
Chaim Kaplan, et al v. Central Bank of Iran, et al
as 16-7142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chaim Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, Rivka Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, M.K.(1), a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Chaim Kaplan, and by her mother and natural guardian, Rivka Kaplan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, also known as Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran, Bank Saderat, Iran, Bank Saderat, PLC and others
Special Master - Appellee:
Alan L. Balaran
Michael Newdow, et al v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 09-5126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Arthur Newdow, Ellery Schempp, Mel Lipman and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Presidential Inaugural Committee, PIC, Emmett Beliveau, Executive Director, PIC and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
State of Texas, American Center for Law and Justice, State of Alabama and others
NEWDOW et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2008cv02248
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEWDOW, ELLERY SCHEMPP, MEL LIPMAN and others
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, JR., PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURAL COMMITTEE, JOINT CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE ON INAUGURAL CEREMONIES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
