Cases 51 - 60 of 362
K.O. et al v. SESSIONS, III et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, JOHN DOE CBP AGENTS, JOHN DOE ORR PERSONNEL and others
Plaintiff:
C.J., F.C., L.J. and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PRINGLE v. WORTON et al
as 1:2019cv03691
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. NASH and JAMES D. WORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. COURT OF MEDICAL BENEFIT SOCIETY
as 1:2019cv03461
Defendant:
COURT OF MEDICAL BENEFIT SOCIETY
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTONIO D. WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2019cv02569
Plaintiff:
MARCUS R. FREEMAN and MARCELLUS R. FREEMAN
Defendant:
REGGIE B. WALTON, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, CHANNING D. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOWTY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv02418
Petitioner:
EARL D. DOWTY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STANTON v. JACOBSON et al
as 1:2019cv00699
Undetermined:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Major General james a jacobson
Petitioner:
LaDarion D. Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
JACOBS v. HENDRIX et al
as 1:2019cv00676
Defendant:
C. MARUKA, ROSALEZ, M. DANAHER and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRUCE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et. al.
as 1:2019cv00352
Undetermined:
Robert J. Tomlinson, M.D.
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC D. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL STEVEN BRUCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOONER v. MILLER et al
as 1:2019cv00338
Defendant:
J. LEON HOLMES, JERRY W. CAVANEAU, BETH DEER and others
Plaintiff:
TERRICK NOONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
