Cases 1 - 10 of 132
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LUZUNARIS v. MORROGH
as 1:2022cv01698
Petitioner:
JOSE LUZUNARIS
Respondent:
RAYMOND F. MORROGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CABEZAS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv02484
Defendant:
STABENOW, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
Plaintiff:
DOW and ANDREW F. CABEZAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02247
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. SHELLEY et al
as 1:2020cv01355
Defendant:
KATHLEEN WACH, UNITED STATES, ANTHONY F. SHELLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant:
MILLER AND CHEVALIER CHARTERED, MARIA JONES, MARY LOU SOLLER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JEROME MILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.O. et al v. SESSIONS, III et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, JOHN DOE CBP AGENTS, JOHN DOE ORR PERSONNEL and others
Plaintiff:
C.J., F.C., L.J. and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TAYLOR et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2019cv03051
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, A. RASCHKE and K. GREEN
Plaintiff:
KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS TRUST, KIRELL F. BETTIS and KIRELL TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
