Cases 91 - 100 of 467
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
IBN-SADIIKA v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01880
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH H. IBN-SADIIKA
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JEH CHARLES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KINGSTON v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01861
Plaintiff:
ROALSTON STEVENSON KINGSTON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JEH CHARLES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANAMATHAREDDY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv01865
Plaintiff:
PRASAD KANAMATHAREDDY
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
TURNER v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01851
Plaintiff:
DONALD TURNER
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MARK KIRBY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Medicine Shoppe v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 14-1223
Petitioner:
The Medicine Shoppe
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, Michele M. Leonhart, in his official capacity as Administrator, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
PAUL v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2014mc01235
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY W. PAUL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014mc01176
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEWIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KNOWN AND UNKNOWN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EMPLOYEES and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
