Cases 111 - 120 of 165
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01673
Defendant:
ROY A. COOPER III, LEXIS PUBLISHING, NANCY S. NASH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00398
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sherry Dow v. Debbie Stabenow, et al
as 21-5005
Defendant / Appellee:
Fairchild Airforce Base, Central Intelligence Agency, United Nations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sherry Lynn Dow
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03737
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
JONES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv02821
Defendant:
CLERK BRETT FRIEND, DAVID GROSSO, BRIANNE K. MADEAU and others
Plaintiff:
PRINCE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOW v. STABENOW et al
as 1:2020cv02486
Defendant:
HEADQUARTERS U.S. AIR FORCE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, COMCAST, MOODY AIR FORCE BASE and others
Plaintiff:
SHERRY LYNN DOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawyers United Inc., et al v. USA, et al
as 20-5269
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Smith, Judicial Circuit Judge, James M. Lorenz, District Judge, Mark Walker and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Evelyn Aimee DeJesus and Lawyers United Inc.
Not Yet Classified:
Allan Wainwright
Zachary Johnson, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5155
Defendant / Appellee:
David S. Tatel, United States Circuit Judge, Cornelia T.L. Pillard, United States Circuit Judge, John D. Bates, U.S. District Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zachary Johnson and Russell Hill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
