Cases 11 - 20 of 163
USA v. Naquel Henderson
as 22-3003
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Naquel Henderson
LATHAM v. GILL et al
as 1:2021cv03168
Plaintiff:
vanai y latham and VANAI LATHAM
Defendant:
JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, john gill and sandra henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Larry Klayman v. Neomi Rao, et al
as 21-5269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Neomi Rao, Hon., Robert Leon Wilkins, Hon., Laurence H. Silberman, Hon. and others
HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv02837
Plaintiff:
DAVON HENDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv02517
Plaintiff:
HENDERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL CORP doing business as MARGARET R. PARDEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL also known as PARDEE HOSPITAL, JOHNSTON HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION also known as JOHNSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as JOHNSTON HEALTH, HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
KLAYMAN v. RAO et al
as 1:2021cv02473
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN and LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN
Defendant:
NEOMI RAO, ROBERT L. WILKINS, LAURENCE H. SILBERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENDERSON v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02183
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Respondent:
JOE BIDEN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HENDERSON v. USA
as 1:2020cv02243
Petitioner:
NAQUEL HENDERSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Zachary Johnson, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5155
Defendant / Appellee:
David S. Tatel, United States Circuit Judge, Cornelia T.L. Pillard, United States Circuit Judge, John D. Bates, U.S. District Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zachary Johnson and Russell Hill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
