Cases 11 - 20 of 51
HERNANDEZ v. RITO LOCO LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02071
Plaintiff:
GUENDI MENDEZ HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
LOUIE HANKINS and RITO LOCO LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Raphael Mendez v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-5115
Petitioner / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Respondent / Appellee:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and House and Senate Judiciary Committee Members
GRIFFIN et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2019cv00762
Defendant:
JOHN KOSKINEN, K. COLT, JAMES P. CALIGURE and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL ADEYEMI OMOTOSHO, MICHAEL T. CHOCK, JULIO RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDEZ v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2018cv01164
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL MENDEZ
Defendant:
DONALD TRUMP, JEFF SESSIONS and STACEY E. PLASKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Welter Mendez
as 17-3067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Welter Mendez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-7101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Detroit International Bridge, et al v. Government of Canada, et al
as 16-5270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Detroit International Bridge Company, a Michigan corporation and Canadian Transit Company, a Canadian special act corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Government of Canada, Federal Highway Administration, Victor Mendez, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Federal Highway Administration and others
MENDEZ v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00326
Defendant:
WMATA
Plaintiff:
JUAN MENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00082
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CASTRO et al v. JOHN SHORB LANDSCAPING, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv02011
Plaintiff:
RENE CASTRO , JUSTINIANO G. MENDEZ and ANGEL MINER
Defendant:
JOHN SHORB LANDSCAPING, INC. , JOHN SHORB LANDSCAPING II, INC., SHORB TRUCKING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
