Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Lamar Chapman, III v. L.R. Heath, et al
as 19-5338
Defendant / Appellee: Barry Sierro, "Born Alien" in his Personal Capacity, also known as Barry Surroro, R. Duclos, in his Personal Capacity and Estate Survival by Death, J. Davenport, in his Personal Capacity and Estate Capable of Death Survival and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lamar C. Chapman, III, Sacredotalist, Espistemologist, and ISBC, Ph ESD, in his Oathful and Duty Bound Public Interest Capacity, as a Life Tenured, "Inferior Officer" of the United States of America, as Authorized by Article II, Section 2, of the Uni
Halogenated Solvents Industry v. EPA
as 19-1115
Petitioner: Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance, Inc
Respondent: Andrew Wheeler, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
Not Yet Classified: Natural Resources Defense Council, Lauren Atkins, Wendy Hartley and others
League of Women Voters, et al v. Brian Newby, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-7027
Plaintiff / Appellee: League of Women Voters of the United States, Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Georgia and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Public Interest Legal Foundation and Scott Schwab, Kansas Secretary of State
Petitioner / Appellant: Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund
Defendant / Appellee: Brian D. Newby, in his capacity as the Executive Director of the United States Election Assistance Commission and United States Election Assistance Commission
ENGLISH v. TRUMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02534
Petitioner: STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Amicus Curiae: STENY HOYER, BRAD SHERMAN, ELIZABETH WARREN and others
Defendant: JOHN MICHAEL MULVANEY, DONALD JOHN TRUMP and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff: LEANDRA ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST et al v. PRICE et al
as 1:2017cv01085
Defendant: TOM PRICE, SCOTT GOTTLIEB and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST and NATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Lamar Chapman, III v. Barack Obama
as 17-5100
Plaintiff - Appellant: Lamar C. Chapman, III, In His Oathful and Duty Bound Public Interest Capacity, aa Perpetual, "Inferior Officer" of the United States of America as Established by Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution
Defendant - Appellee: Barack Hussein Obama, In His Personal and Individual Capacity As Ineligible Commander In Chief of the Executive Branch of Government; Void Forty Fourth President of the United States of America, also known as Barry Surroro, also known as Barack Dunham, al
Consumers for Auto Reliability, et al v. FTC
as 17-1125
Petitioner: Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, Center for Auto Safety and U.S. Public Interest Research Group, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Trade Commission
CONSUMERS FOR AUTO RELIABILITY AND SAFETY et al v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00540
Plaintiff: CONSUMERS FOR AUTO RELIABILITY AND SAFETY , CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY and U.S. PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP
Defendant: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
American Society for Testing, et al v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
as 17-7035
Amicus Curiae: David Michaels, Bruce R. James, Robert B. Reich and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: National Fire Protection Association, Inc., American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. and American Society for Testing and Materials
Defendant / Appellant: Public.Resource.Org, Inc.
Consumers for Auto Reliability, et al v. FTC
as 17-1038
Petitioner: Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, Center for Auto Safety, U.S. Public Interest Research Group, Inc. and others
Respondent: Federal Trade Commission

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?