Cases 11 - 20 of 856
JONES v. JUDICIAL BRANCH OF U.S. GOVERNMENT
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
JUDICIAL BRANCH OF U.S. GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Matthew Jones v. Judicial Branch of United States Government
as 24-5090
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Judicial Branch of United States Government
Fred Gonzales v. Rashida Jones, et al
as 24-7049
Plaintiff:
Fred Gonzales
Defendant:
Rashida Jones, Owner and CEO of MSNBC, Mark Thompson, Owner and CEO of CNN, Suzanne Scott, CEO of Fox and Friends News Network and others
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc v. NLRB
as 24-1079
Petitioner:
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and CURTIS CRISTE
Tobias Jones v. United States Secret Service, et al
as 23-5288
Plaintiff:
Tobias Jones
Defendant:
United States Secret Service, of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, James Fisher, Officer and Holland, Sergeant; all individuals being sued in their individual and official capacity
JONES v. CENTRAL DISTRICT STATION
as 1:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
CENTRAL DISTRICT STATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv03627
Plaintiff:
HELEN M. JONES
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
ADAMKAVICIUS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv03571
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ADAMKAVICIUS, JOYCE MEHRER, KEVIN MEHRER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
