Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Mike Webb v. Department of the Army, et al
as 22-5292
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mike Webb, Major, doing business as Friends for Mike Webb, also known as Major Mike Webb for Congress
Respondent / Appellee:
Department of the Army, Defense Intelligence Agency, Merit Systems Protection Board and others
WEBB v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
MIKE WEBB doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB (C00591537) doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS (H8VA08167) doing business as ANGELS OF LIBERTY and MIKE WEBB Major doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB (C00591537) doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS (H8VA08167) doing business as ANGELS OF LIBERTY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION and FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Mike Webb v. Merrick Garland
as 22-5192
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mike Webb, doing business as Friends for Mike Webb, doing business as Major Mike Webb for Congress, doing business as Angels of Liberty
Respondent / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, in official capacity
WEBB v. GARLAND
as 1:2022cv01595
Petitioner:
MIKE WEBB doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS agent of ANGELS OF LIBERTY and MIKE WEBB Major doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS agent of ANGELS OF LIBERTY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
WEBB v. FERRIERIERO
as 1:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
MIKE WEBB
Defendant:
DAVID FERRIERIERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WEBB v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
as 1:2021cv00973
Plaintiff:
MAJOR MIKE WEBB
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
