Cases 11 - 20 of 82
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of Iowa, et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1144
Petitioner:
State of Iowa, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Nancy Huisha-Huisha, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-5325
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, and her minor child, I.M.C.H., Valeria Macancela Bermejo, and her minor daughter and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, Tae Johnson, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Rochelle P. Walensky, Dr., Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor:
State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
State of Texas, et al v. NHTSA, et al
as 22-1144
Petitioner:
State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Indiana and others
Respondent:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Steven Cliff, in his offical capacity as Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, United States Department of Transportation and others
EDWARDS et al v. STATE OF ALABAMA et al
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
LUKE EDWARDS, ALABAMA - MISSISSIPPI FARM, INC. and HERITAGE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, IRA DRAYTON PRUITT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1031
Petitioner:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
American Academy of Pediatrics, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1060
Petitioner:
Natural Resources Council of Maine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Public Health Association and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Wood Council, State of Mississippi, State of Montana and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
