Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
STATE OF TEXAS v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Movant:
ERIC KENNIE , ANNA BURNS , MICHAEL MONTEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amer. Fed. of Govt. Employees, et al v. Carol Pope, et al
as 11-5308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 2798 and Mohammed A. Hussain
Defendant - Appellee:
Carol Waller Pope, Chairman, Federal Labor Relations Authority and Julia Akins Clark, General Counsel
POPE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02249
Plaintiff:
MARIE POPE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES et al v. POPE et al
as 1:2010cv01012
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES and MOHAMMED A. HUSSAIN
Defendant:
CAROL WALLER POPE and JULIA AKINS CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRIS, et al v. KOENIG, et al
as 1:2002cv00618
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. HARRIS , REGINALD E. HOWARD and PETER M. THORNTON, SR.
Defendant:
JAMES E. KOENIG , WASTE MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, INC. , WASTE MANAGEMENT RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHEPHARD v. POPE et al
as 1:2008cv02125
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
SHIRLEY POPE, JOHN WILLAMOWSKI, TODD BOOKS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
