Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 118
ROJAS et al v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al
as 1:2023cv03140
Plaintiff: EDWIN L. ROJAS and PLAN B NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nancy Huisha-Huisha, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-5325
Plaintiff / Appellee: Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, and her minor child, I.M.C.H., Valeria Macancela Bermejo, and her minor daughter and others
Defendant / Appellant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, Tae Johnson, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Rochelle P. Walensky, Dr., Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor: State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Mississippi
Petitioner: Immigration Reform Law Institute
ABNER v. STATE OF TEXAS
as 1:2022cv01786
Petitioner: EUGENE SHANNON ABNER
Respondent: STATE OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner: State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae: The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified: ConservAmerica
Nancy Huisha-Huisha, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-5200
Plaintiff / Appellee: Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, and her minor child, L.M.C.H., Valeria Macancela Bermejo, and her minor daughter and others
Defendant / Appellant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, William A. Ferrara, Executive Assistant Commissioner, CBP Office of Field Operations, in his official capacity, Raul L. Ortiz, Chief of U.S. Border Patrol, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: T. Alexander Aleinikoff, Deborah Anker, James C. Hathaway and others
State of Arizona, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1159
Petitioner: State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Ohio and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Reagan, Administrator
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee: Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
American Academy of Pediatrics, et al v. EPA, et al
as 21-1060
Petitioner: Natural Resources Council of Maine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Public Health Association and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: American Wood Council, State of Mississippi, State of Montana and others
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?