Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SCIOLI v. CITY OF NEW BERN et al
as 1:2016cv00877
Plaintiff:
DANA SCIOLI
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BERN, COUNTY OF LOUDOUN, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. CIA et al
as 1:2015cv01473
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WARREN
Defendant:
CIA and LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CUSTIS v. CIA et al
as 1:2015cv01153
Petitioner:
JEANNE ABIGAIL CUSTIS
Respondent:
CIA, HOMELAND SECURITY and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv00959
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Melinda Mckinzie v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-5165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melinda Mckinzie
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, "BARRY", personally and in his official capacity, Michelle Lavaughn Robinson Obama, personally and in her official capacity, James B. Comey, FBI, personally and in his official capacity and others
CARTER v. BUSH et al
as 1:2015cv00778
Plaintiff:
AUDREY TAYLOR CARTER
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TAYLOR v. CONTI et al
as 1:2014cv00288
Petitioner:
SPENCER TAYLOR
Respondent:
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, NORA BARRY FISHER, CIA OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ling Hu v. Department of Defense, et al
as 13-5157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ling Yuan Hu
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
