Cases 21 - 30 of 37
COLBERT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv02040
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY COLBERT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
EDMUNDS v. BUSH et al
as 1:2016cv00979
Plaintiff:
HEATHER ANN EDMUNDS
Defendant:
GEORGE W BUSH, SR, KEITH ZOLLINGER, MARTHA THORPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv01328
Plaintiff:
ROGER JOSEPH WILLIS, ELY CHEN, GEORGE J. BARR and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF NICHOLAS L. AMABILE, ESTATE OF DANIEL H. COURTNEY, ESTATE OF LAWRENCE D. OLBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
BOYD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00958
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY BOYD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN AGENTS OF F.B.I. and UNKOWN ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEYS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WADE v. MILLER et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
E K WADE
Defendant:
JEFF MILLER, GARY ACKERMAN, SANDY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOUGLAS v. CHARIOTS FOR HIRE et al
as 1:2012cv00429
Plaintiff:
CHARITA DOUGLAS
Defendant:
CHARIOTS FOR HIRE, M AND C ENTERPRISE, INC., MICHAEL P. FORTKORT and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LASKO v. WALSH et al
as 1:2011cv02110
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE LYLE LASKO
Defendant:
THOMAS P. WALSH, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, COURTNEY A. PAIGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ADAMS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv01646
Plaintiff:
GRANT O. ADAMS , JIMMY R. ANDERSON , JOSE R. ARIAS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RAY LAHOOD and J. RANDOLPH BABBITT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
