Cases 21 - 30 of 235
Jan Hamilton v. Marcus Stevens, et al
as 19-5153
Defendant / Appellee:
Betsey Rackley, Henry Courtney, Margaret Costan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jan B. Hamilton
STONE v. ZIPPS et al
as 1:2019cv01509
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, JENNIFER G. ZIPPS, ROY R. LUSTIG and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. ZIPPS et al
as 1:2019cv01401
Defendant:
JENNIFER G. ZIPPS, ROY R. LUSTIG, DAVID D. KARTH and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CLARK v. CUEVA et al
as 1:2018cv01460
Plaintiff:
HELGA G. SUAREZ CLARK
Defendant:
CARLOS CASTELLON CUEVA, RORY LAZO BUSTAMENTE, NILO PARAVICINO ALARCON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAMILTON v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2018cv01158
Defendant:
WENDY POHLHAUS, LESLIE PARSONS, CHANNING PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAVAZOS et al v. ZINKE et al
as 1:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
JULIA CAVAZOS , NANCY CISNEROS , DEBRA CICALO and others
Defendant:
RYAN ZINKE, JOHN TAHSUDA, III and BRYAN RICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
ISAAC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
WENDELL D. ISAAC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Barbosa, et al v. DHS, et al
as 17-5206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Barbosa, Luis Barbosa, Ramon Bueno and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency
Victor Perkins v. John Ashcroft, et al
as 17-5166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Bernard Perkins
Defendant - Appellee:
John D. Ashcroft, Alberto R. Gonzales, Eric H. Holder, Jr. and others
PERKINS v. ASHCROFT et al
as 1:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
VICTOR B. PERKINS
Defendant:
JOHN ASHCROFT, ALBERTO GONZALES, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
