Cases 21 - 30 of 4,219
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Hodings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
RAY v. PRIVER et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
AMES RAY
Defendant:
DONALD PRIVER, JON LAWSON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HASSON v. NEW VISION PROPERTIES LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
John Appleton Hasson
Defendant:
Justin Sprinzen, Nicole Sprinzen and New Vision Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE DC LODGE 1 NAVEL DISTRICT et al. v. SIMMS et al.
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police DC Lodge 1 Naval District Washington Labor Committee, PHILLIP GRIFFIN, Jennifer Smith and others
Defendant:
Happy Simms, Sherman Benton, David Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
