Cases 21 - 30 of 996
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00800
Plaintiff:
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, ANAHEIM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, WHITTIER HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SCOTT v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SCOTT
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and KAMILA HARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
SCOTT v. HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SCOTT
Defendant:
HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BURNS
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
Stephen Scott Burns
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
GONZALES v. JONES et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
FRED GONZALES
Defendant:
RASHIDA JONES, MARK THOMPSON, SUZANNE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DEHGHAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD R. DEHGHAN and PADIDEH DEHGHAN
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, MORA NAMDAR and SCOTT M. OUDKIRK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
F. Bauer, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 24-5013
Plaintiff:
F. Scott Bauer and Jeffrey T. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Southern Community Financial Corporation, Southern Community Financial, LLC and others
F. Bauer, et al v. FDIC, et al
as 24-5014
Plaintiff:
F. Scott Bauer and Jeffrey T. Clark
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Southern Community Financial Corporation, Southern Community Financial, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
