Cases 21 - 30 of 2,007
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER, DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ROSEMOND v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
GARRY ROSEMOND
Defendant:
PAMELA B. WASHINGTON and KIMBERLY SMITH
SNOWDEN v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL SNOWDEN
Defendant:
THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METRO TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER DAVIS # 892 and others
ZARGARAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
SIMIN ZARGARAN
Not Yet Classified:
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, JULIE M. STUFFT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HAFEZ v. VIDINO et al
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
FARID HAFEZ
Defendant:
LORENZO VIDINO, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, PROGRAM FOR EXTREMISM AT THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ENDRES v. AIR CANADA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ENDRES
Defendant:
AIR CANADA, INC., AIR FRANCE-KLM S.A., ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CHISLEY et al v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
BRYCE CHISLEY and APRIL COLE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and DIAMOND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC.
WP COMPANY LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
WP COMPANY LLC doing business as WASHINGTON POST
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
