Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02631
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
MAYS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv02197
Plaintiff: JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
GAHR v. SAPERSTEIN et al
as 1:2020cv00964
Defendant: KARL ROVE, HUDSON INSTITUTE, JAY LEFKOWITZ and others
Plaintiff: EVAN GAHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00892
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
JENKINS v. PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv03510
Defendant: MISCHO, HALL, TARRA C. MUNNINGLY and others
Plaintiff: THOMAS KEVIN JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAYS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2019cv02200
Plaintiff: TARRA MAYS
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00494
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
Plaintiff: NANCY MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYS v. SUMMERFORD
as 1:2019cv00342
Plaintiff: SATOYA MAYS
Defendant: ANITA ELAINE FONG SUMMERFORD and ANITA ELAINE TONG SUMMERFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. GREAT BRITAIN et al
as 1:2019cv00118
Respondent: NICARAGUA, TERESA MAY, GREAT BRITAIN and others
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DOCKHAM v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv03115
Defendant: IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff: NELLIE MAY DOCKHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?