Cases 31 - 40 of 799
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
O'DIAH v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv00653
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, JOHN G. ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff:
AROR-ARK ARK O'DIAH
Claimant:
SYNCHRONY BANK and PARK & NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
VIRTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
VIRTUS PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ANNE MILGRAM and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Manoranjan Rao v. SEC, et al
as 23-1072
Petitioner:
Manoranjan Rao
Respondent:
Securities and Exchange Commission and Vanessa Ann Countryman, Secretary
Sandpiper Residents Association, et al v. HUD
as 22-5334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sandpiper Residents Association, Betty Ann Dergin and Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
ALEXANDER v. LONG
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
LIAM ALEXANDER
Defendant:
ANN LONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rebecca Snyder, et al v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-1007
Petitioner:
Rebecca Snyder, Gemi Spaulding, Wilbert Louis Ogden and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Anne Milgram, DEA Administrator and Edward Hendrie, Counsel DEA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
