Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PRIOR PEREIRA v. FEDERAL COURT FOR FEDERAL CLAIMS et al
as 1:2009cv01175
Plaintiff:
MARIA LURDES PRIOR PEREIRA
Defendant:
FEDERAL COURT FOR FEDERAL CLAIMS, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT, U.S. TREASURY DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORD v. SHUKER et al
as 1:2009cv01105
Plaintiff:
ERNEST B. FORD
Defendant:
NAN R. SHUKER, US ATTORNEY'S OFFICER FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and US JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BYERS v. UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2008cv01421
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY T. BYERS, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JAMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00474
Plaintiff:
SAM H. JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THIRD CIRCUIT and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ADDAMS-MORE v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv02022
Plaintiff:
MARTI ADDAMS-MORE
Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUDOLPH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007mc00272
Plaintiff:
ERNEST RUDOLPH, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Motion for Reconsideration of Court Ruling
COTNER v. UNKNOWN US GOVERNMENT AGENTS et al
as 1:2007cv00520
Plaintiff:
ROBERT COTNER
Defendant:
UNKNOWN US GOVERNMENT AGENTS, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
