Cases 31 - 40 of 127
MEIKLE v. OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
as 1:2019cv02436
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
Plaintiff:
MARCUS MEIKLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GASKINS v. ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY GOVERNMENT
as 1:2019mc00112
Defendant:
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff:
MARCUS C. GASKINS
Jan Hamilton v. Marcus Stevens, et al
as 19-5153
Defendant / Appellee:
Betsey Rackley, Henry Courtney, Margaret Costan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jan B. Hamilton
Marcus Gaskins v. Neil Chatterjee
as 19-5058
Defendant / Appellee:
Neil Chatterjee, Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Christopher Gaskins
M&T BANK et al v. BROWN et al
as 1:2019cv00578
Defendant:
RIDGECREST CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, MARCUS LITTLE and DELPHINIA N. BROWN
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION and M&T BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2018cv02425
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HAROLD WARD, MELISSA C. NETZNIK, K.A.H. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY, BANK MELLI IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01654
Defendant:
DIANA MURPHY, UNK KELLY, JULIE PETERS and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DERAMUS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION et al
as 1:2018cv01486
Plaintiff:
MARCUS DERAMUS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION and MONTGOMERY COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICE BUILDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EPSTEIN v. RAW STORY MEDIA, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv01481
Defendant:
RAW STORY MEDIA, INC., DAVID FERGUSON, ROXANNE COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS YUNG-GYU EPSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
